Comments on: AS_AM_STFU http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/2010/02/03/as_am_stfu/ errands Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:07:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: damien http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/2010/02/03/as_am_stfu/comment-page-1/#comment-187 damien Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:18:43 +0000 http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/?p=154#comment-187 <a href="#comment-186" rel="nofollow">@Mike</a> It's meant to be used along with AM_SILENT_RULES, it'll just simulate you typing "make -s" (or having an alias for it) but respecting the default verbosity of the AM_SILENT_RULES, ie, it will do the right thing when your project is configured with either --enable-silent-rules and or --disable-silent-rules @Mike It’s meant to be used along with AM_SILENT_RULES, it’ll just simulate you typing “make -s” (or having an alias for it) but respecting the default verbosity of the AM_SILENT_RULES, ie, it will do the right thing when your project is configured with either –enable-silent-rules and or –disable-silent-rules

]]> By: Mike http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/2010/02/03/as_am_stfu/comment-page-1/#comment-186 Mike Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:00:19 +0000 http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/?p=154#comment-186 Does it differ much against AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])? http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#index-silent_002drules-916 Does it differ much against AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])?

http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#index-silent_002drules-916

]]>